• Mark Shaw

Managing Poor Performance

I’ve spoken before about how the age-old problems with performance management have refused to go away for the past 30 years and will remain for the next 30, unless we think and act differently.

Remember we create rules for the small percentage of people who break the rules no matter what those rules are. This is most obvious when it comes to trying to manage poor performance where for 30 years or more, we have tried an adversarial, rule-bound approach that the evidence indicates has fundamentally failed.

New thinking is required. I argue that poor performers can do their job they are simply choosing not to do so. I call them 2%-ers. It’s therefore not about managing their performance; it’s actually about trying to re-engage dis-engaged employees.

Next time a manager approaches you with “Carol is not performing”, I suggest you don’t blame her or start a performance improvement plan. Instead, I advocate the following 3-step process – undertaken 3 times!

  1. Check the facts. What behaviour has occurred? What rules were breached?

  2. Identify the management problem caused by this behaviour.

  3. Identify a solution to the management problem.

  4. Initially prepare a plan, then have the conversation with the 2%-er and finally create a signed summary documenting the conversation and agreement.

Now you have a process built on solving a management problem rather than telling an employee they are not performing.

This approach has worked for over 20 years and most importantly, when challenged it is deemed to be “reasonable management action taken in a reasonable way”.

Remember it’s not about poor performance; it’s actually about an individual choosing not to engage.

Based on my experience, I encourage you to consider this approach and I am happy to provide a copy of our template to anyone who is interested.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Rigid Processes and Work Friction

Aaron McEwan from Gartner gave a great presentation at a recent conference on how the current rigid processes and practices in our workplaces are a significant impediment to improving business outcome

JCU V Ridd – Lessons for HR

Based on the Federal Court of Australia’s transcript. Professor Ridd was employed by JCU for a period of twenty-seven years and was terminated on 2 May 2018 for serious misconduct. According to the co

Mark Shaw

HR Business and Systems Improvement


+61 7 3333 1921

+61 411 349 222

©2019 by Mark Shaw.