Search
  • Mark Shaw

Managing Social Media Problems

There is no doubt Social Media is here to stay or that it affects workplace issues.

As witnessed in the recent case in the UK where a 57-year-old lawyer was accused of “unacceptable and misogynistic behaviour” after he sent a barrister half his age a LinkedIn message complimenting her on her “stunning picture” (which was apparently a professionally taken head-and-shoulders portrait).  See http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11852887/Lawyer-accused-of-sexism-after-complimenting-barrister-on-stunning-LinkedIn-picture.html


You may recall, the younger female barrister responded using Twitter to paste both the original Linked In message she received and her reply.


As I understand the sequence of events, the older, male lawyer never had an opportunity to respond and later apologised saying “Most people post pretty unprofessional pictures on Linked in, my comment was aimed at the professional quality of the presentation on linked in which was unfortunately misinterpreted.” 


The question I raise is not whether the message was inappropriate, unacceptable and/or misogynistic behaviour.  It may have been; it may not have been; I certainly have not seen sufficient details to make such a judgement. 


The question I raise is how would you handle a similar situation if it happened in your workplace?  Would you consider it a:

  • Performance management issue?

  • Bullying issue?

  • Harassment issue?

  • Discipline Issue?

  • Discrimination Issue

  • 2%-er issue?

In the Australian Industrial Relations system, a key consideration in such a case is not what policy you select but rather whether “reasonable management action was taken in a reasonable way” to manage the situation.


The problem with selecting one of the first five options is you might be deemed to have chosen the wrong one, and my experience indicates that would almost certainly be deemed “not reasonable”.

  

Based on my 20 years’ experience, I’d recommend you select the sixth option because:

This type of situation only occurs infrequently or rarely (i.e 2% of the time).

If you focus on the management problem that the behavior caused and attempt to resolve that problem, my experience says it will be deemed “reasonable management action was taken in a reasonable way”.


As I have argued before, if things only happen infrequently, having over-the-top regulation to manage them is a waste of time, effort and resources that does more harm than good.  Keep it simple is what has worked for me over the past 20 years.


As always, the choice is yours; over reaction and a complex solution or simplicity and defendable reasonable management action.  What will you do when confronted with something similar?


Ps.  Happy to share our approach with anyone who is interested.

1 view

Recent Posts

See All

JCU V Ridd – Lessons for HR

Based on the Federal Court of Australia’s transcript. Professor Ridd was employed by JCU for a period of twenty-seven years and was terminated on 2 May 2018 for serious misconduct. According to the co

Why Re-engage Dis-engaged Employees

The answer is simple. It permanently resolves the problems caused by the dis-engaged employee. And those problems are expensive in terms of time, money, and most importantly emotional energy. Yes, I c

The New HR Normal

The Queensland Chief Health Officer is quoted as warning that we may never beat Covid-19 and the only thing we can do is manage it. What does this mean for HR Practitioners and people-management gener

Mark Shaw

HR Business and Systems Improvement

Specialist

+61 7 3333 1921

+61 411 349 222

©2019 by Mark Shaw.